The History of Natural Language Processing: Difference between revisions

From ETHW
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


Please let me know if you have any suggestions!
Please let me know if you have any suggestions!
==Comments==
Not quite getting the connection your trying to establish between the quest for artificial life and natural language processing.  Wouldn't the development of AI preclude the need for natural language processing, as a truly "intelligent" AI would implicitly understand language in a human way?  Natural language processing would seem to only be relevant in a world where we are trying to make non-sentient machines process language in intelligent and natural ways.
Nor do I think there is a strong case that natural language processing, a la Watson, equates to Artificial intelligence/life in the broad sense you seem to imply? 
--[[User:Srterpe|Srterpe]] 14:01, 11 December 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 19:01, 11 December 2011

Hello! I am a student in the History of Computing class at San Jose State University (http://www.cs.sjsu.edu/~mak/CS185C/). This is a work in progress that will turn into a final article by the end of the semester. I welcome your comments and advice!

My official topic is: "The history and development of text based natural language processing." It is a very interesting topic to me and I have plans to go to the SRI with in the next two weeks or so and I will be posting more information as I go!

If any one has information they would like to share please email me at rlichtig@gmail.com, or you can make a discussion about it.

Thank you very much and all input is helpful!

- Ryan Lichtig Sophomore SJSU Computer Science Major



Rough Draft of Introduction:

Talos, in Greek mythology, is the guardian of Europa and her land of Crete. Forged by the divine smith Hephaistos; Talos is an automaton, an autonomous machine of bronze that patrolled Europa’s land protecting it against enemies and invaders. This divine guardian and deity generated the idea of synthetic life and intelligence, but this idea was only that: a concept. The capability of creating such magnificent devices was left to the Gods themselves, something no human could ever achieve. However, thousands of years later, during 1818, Mary Shelly immortalizes Frankenstein’s monster and changed the idea from something divine to something human, the creation of artificial life and intelligence through the medium of science. Now is when artificial life and intelligence begins, now it is possible, now something man made that could be created and would have the ability to live, to learn, and to, most importantly, adapt. While Mary Shelly’s novel was purely fiction it allowed for the thought of human made synthetic life to take over, rewriting the idea long instilled by the Greek myths. Then during World War II another major advancement took place, the creation of Colossus. This computer, although hidden for years by Great Britain, electronically decrypted German messages encrypted by the Enigma machine. Colossus can be considered one of the first modern computers, a technology that allowed a super human amount of calculations to occur in a relatively small amount of time. Thus with biological science proving ineffective for creating synthetic life, humanity moved to technology and computers in their quest for artificial life and intelligence. Shortly after World War II had ended came the Cold War with Soviet Russia. With tensions wrung high and missiles at the ready, natural language processing was invented, with some government funding of course. The scare of nuclear war sparked the development of natural language processing, beginning with the translation of the Russian language, both spoken and written, to English and culminating with modern marvels such as Watson and the hand held Siri.

Please let me know if you have any suggestions!

Comments

Not quite getting the connection your trying to establish between the quest for artificial life and natural language processing. Wouldn't the development of AI preclude the need for natural language processing, as a truly "intelligent" AI would implicitly understand language in a human way? Natural language processing would seem to only be relevant in a world where we are trying to make non-sentient machines process language in intelligent and natural ways.

Nor do I think there is a strong case that natural language processing, a la Watson, equates to Artificial intelligence/life in the broad sense you seem to imply?

--Srterpe 14:01, 11 December 2011 (EST)