- Page created by EMW, 9 September 2008
- Contributors: EMW x2, WikiSysop x2, Nbrewer x5, Administrator1 x3
- Last modified by Administrator1, 4 November 2013
Thomas Edison almost invented radio. During November of 1875 Edison and his assistants were busy working to improve telegraphic devices. They were using a vibrating device to generate a small alternating electrical current of high frequency. They noticed that when the device vibrated, metal objects that touched it generated sparks. Although this phenomenon was known among telegraph operators, Edison decided that it must represent a new and as yet unknown force. After careful experimentation, Edison determined that the force was not caused by electromagnetic induction. The team decided to give this mysterious new force a name—the “etheric” (ee-theer-ic) force.
When it was reported in the papers, however, Edison was ridiculed. The etheric force was compared to claims that others had made about mysterious new forces, such as “psychic” forces that could allow telepathy. Elihu Thompson and Edwin Houston published the results of their own experiments and concluded that the etheric force was simply electromagnetic induction, and Edison soon dropped his experiments. Thompson and Houston, however, were wrong.
What Edison had actually discovered, though neither he nor his opponents understood it, was the basis of radio communication. The vibrator he used produced radio frequency electromagnetic waves, which caused the sparks in nearby metal objects. The waves would tend to follow a conductor, even a very long one such as the telegraph line from Newark to New Brunswick. If a detector of radio waves had been available, it might have picked up the Edison transmissions from a long distance. Unfortunately, it would be more than a decade before Edison’s contribution would be appreciated. In 1889, Heinrich Hertz completed his experiments proving the existence of radio waves.
<rating comment="false"> Well Written? 1 (No) 2 3 4 5 (Yes) </rating> <rating comment="false"> Informative? 1 (No) 2 3 4 5 (Yes) </rating> <rating comment="false"> Accurate? 1 (No) 2 3 4 5 (Yes) </rating>