IEEE
You are not logged in, please sign in to edit > Log in / create account  

Comments on naming conventions

From GHN

Jump to: navigation, search

Please summarize the below thread in the editing box. You may use any wikitext in your summary. When you finish, click "Save page".

Warning: You are not logged in, please log in first if you have a valid GHN account.

Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.

Please note that all contributions to GHN may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. You are also promising that you wrote this yourself, the material is in the public domain, or that the material contributed respects the copyrights of the original source. In making contributions to the IEEE GHN, you also accept the copyright terms of the IEEE GHN, which are the Creative Commons Legal Code - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (for more details see Creative Commons Legal Code).

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

The proposed milestone has great merits but I find the following flaws/glitches in the title:

Words like Toshiba and T1100 may have little meaning in the future. Who will remember them in 20 or more years? Except for abbreviations like RAMAC, TIROS, NAIC., no other IEEE Milestones carry company or product id numbers. With hundreds of new milestones to be named, how will you manage this in the future?

Why use 'PC' when 'personal computer' will do?

I think that the machine's best feature was its portability, not the way it was arranged on the person's lap, or workstation, or desk. I like the word 'portable' instead of 'laptop' in this case. Portable may be better understood by the general public reading your plaque in the future. I believe the laptop was invented later by Apple - I'm a mac.

My comments need not be addressed nor resolved at this time.

Ggcooke22:49, 4 March 2013