IEEE
You are not logged in, please sign in to edit > Log in / create account  

Thread history

From GHN

Jump to: navigation, search
Time descUser Activity Comment
22:26, 7 September 2011W2ots (Talk | contribs)Comment text edited 
22:25, 7 September 2011W2ots (Talk | contribs)Comment text edited 
22:21, 7 September 2011W2ots (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to Suggested changes to citation from Lyle Feisel)
15:37, 7 September 2011Administrator1 (Talk | contribs)Deleted (content was: "[On behalf of Mort Hans] I think including the date is meaningful. What is the rationale for excluding it?" (and the only contributor was "M.geselowitz"))
13:22, 7 September 2011M.geselowitz (Talk | contribs)[[|New reply]] created (Reply to Suggested changes to citation from Lyle Feisel)
10:50, 7 September 2011Peterhill (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to Suggested changes to citation from Lyle Feisel)
07:40, 6 September 2011Apyuste (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to Suggested changes to citation from Lyle Feisel)
19:05, 2 September 2011Lisetiffner (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to Suggested changes to citation from Lyle Feisel)
14:23, 2 September 2011140.98.210.243 (Talk)New reply created (Reply to Suggested changes to citation from Lyle Feisel)
16:28, 18 August 2011Administrator4 (Talk | contribs)New thread created 

I think the citation needs some work here is the old first sentence and my suggestion for a change:


Original:


In an attempt to automate the reading of product information in a local grocery store, Bernard Silver and Norman Joseph Woodland conceived a solution in 1948 at the Drexel Institute of Technology which later became the ubiquitous Barcode.


My suggestion:


In an effort to automate the reading of product information in a local grocery store, Bernard Silver and Norman Joseph Woodland of the Drexel Institute of Technology developed a system that later became the ubiquitous barcode.

Administrator416:28, 18 August 2011
 

I believe that Lyle's wording tightens up the language without changing meaning. How do others feel?

140.98.210.24314:23, 2 September 2011
 

I prefer Lyle's wording. The original citation also has a redundant "of" which should be cleaned up. - Lise

Lisetiffner19:05, 2 September 2011
 

I agree with Lyle's suggestion, although I would avoid using such "magnification" words as "ubiquituous", "quintessential", or "multi-billion" in the original citation. Those words don't contibute to the historical value of the Milestone and might sound somewhat pretentious. My suggestion, then, on Lyle's suggestion would be:

In an effort to automate the reading of product information in a local grocery store, Bernard Silver and Norman Joseph Woodland of the Drexel Institute of Technology developed a solution that later became the Barcode Identification System. Patented in 1952, the Barcode has become a key technology for product identification and inventory control in present Industry and daily life.

Apyuste07:40, 6 September 2011
 

I prefer Apyuste's wording. Citation has milestone's origin, origination location, significant date and importance. Everything needed. Like a newspaper story, it has the five elements for the reader: Who, What, When, Where and the Why. Mort hans

W2ots22:21, 7 September 2011
 
 

I agree the Bar Code Milestone and prefer the wording by Lyle Feisel.

Peterhill10:50, 7 September 2011