Special:Badtitle/NS90:Milestone-Proposal talk:The 20 inch Diameter Photomultiplier Tubes/a few comments: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:01, 16 July 2013

This proposal is fine. I thought there was a miscount in the number of PMTs somewhere in the documents provided. The citation can better indicate what the PMT's are for: support research in proton decay, or elementary particle physics, or spotting supernovas.

Revision as of 19:59, 16 July 2013 (view source) Ggcooke (talk \| contribs) (New thread: a few comments)		Revision as of 20:01, 16 July 2013 (view source) Ggcooke (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This proposal is fine. I thought there was a miscount in the number of PMTs somewhere in the documents provided. The citation can better indicate what the PMT's are for: support research in proton decay, , or elementary particle physics~~. Or was research dedicated to~~ spotting supernovas?		This proposal is fine. I thought there was a miscount in the number of PMTs somewhere in the documents provided. The citation can better indicate what the PMT's are for: support research in proton decay, or elementary particle physics, or spotting supernovas.