IEEE
You are not logged in, please sign in to edit > Log in / create account  

Thread history

From GHN

From Milestone-Proposal talk:TPC-1 System
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
descTime User Activity Comment
23:54, 10 March 2014Masakuni Kuwazuru (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to It should be a big milestone.)
23:26, 10 March 2014Masakuni Kuwazuru (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to It should be a big milestone.)
09:47, 9 March 2014Masakuni Kuwazuru (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to It should be a big milestone.)
11:57, 8 March 2014Djkemp (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to It should be a big milestone.)
04:45, 3 March 2014Shigeyuki.akiba (Talk | contribs)New thread created 

I think TPC-1 is worthy of being an IEEE Milestone. Before TPC-1 short wave transmission technology was used for telecommunications between Japan and US and a small number of voice channels were available and they were not always stable. In that sense TPC-1 really opened up a way toward broadband telecommunications between Japan and US and it should be a big milestone.

Shigeyuki.akiba04:45, 3 March 2014
 

I support the milestone. I would favor shortening or substituting the last sentence of the citation and in place emphasizing the historical / technological significance.

Djkemp11:57, 8 March 2014
 

How about the following updated Citation?

The first transpacific undersea coaxial telephone cable linking Japan, Hawaii and the US Mainland was completed in 1964. It was a joint project among American Telephone and Telegraph, Hawaiian Telephone Company, and Kokusai Denshin Denwa. Service over this communication bridge was inaugurated on 19 June 1964 by President Lyndon B Johnson and Prime Minister Hayato Ikeda. TPC-1 improved communication between Asia and U.S.A./Europe, and contributed to submarine cable technologies. (69 words)

Kuwazuru (proposer)

Masakuni Kuwazuru09:47, 9 March 2014
 

I noted "TPC-1" Proposal is now "Ready for Board of Directors Action". How about the Citation? Shall I replace the the wording at Proposal by the above updated Citation (as of 9 March) in this Discussion? Kuwazuru (Proposer)

Masakuni Kuwazuru23:26, 10 March 2014
 

Sorry. I now find the Citation at Proposal has been updated based on Discussion. Thank you for the approval by the Historry Committee members. Kuwazuru (Proposer)

Masakuni Kuwazuru23:54, 10 March 2014