IEEE
You are not logged in, please sign in to edit > Log in / create account  

Milestone review 27 March 2013 [ Burger]

From GHN

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 27 May 2013 at 22:13.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

The proposal on the MOSA device looks to be sound and no issues appear to become a point of controversy. Could i suggest the remainder of the submission be completed please, addressing the key points, and then would be happy to propose this Milestone for elevation:

  • 1. Milestone costs disbursement;
  • 2. Responsibility around the award ceremony organsiation;
  • 3. If there is any specific monitoring planned for the proposed Milestone plaque by an IEEE entity;
  • 4. A letter from the owner authorising permission to place the Milestone plaque at the proposed location; and
  • 5. Advice from the Tokyo Section Chair / Council (whichever is approriate here) supporting the Milestone proposal.

Thanks,

David E. Burger, IEEE History Committee, Vice-Chair 2013   (k3hz@ieee.org)

Sydney, Australia.

    vk2cz06:02, 27 March 2013
     

    18 April 2013 Dear Mr. David E. Burger

    We are sorry for our late reply. In reply to your questions on Milestone review of 27 March 2013. Please find the following our answers.

    	1. Milestone costs disbursement: The proposer could bear the cost of the dedication ceremony in Japan, if the costing details are clarified. We learned Mr. Robert Colburm is in the know of such matter. Could you please help us get such costing info.
    	2. Responsibility around the award ceremony organsiation: It rests IEEE Tokyo Section.
    	3. If there is any specific monitoring planned for the proposed Milestone plaque by an IEEE entity: Yes, planned at IEEE Tokyo Section.
    	4. A letter from the owner authorising permission to place the Milestone plaque at the proposed location: Although we applied the data (including the Letter of Site Owner) in our inputting for Milestone Application, we understood that there was some system trouble due to the program updating during early February 2013 and as a result, our data of Letter of Site Owner seemed lost. We attach herewith the requested application data (the Letter of Site Owner).
    	5. Advice from the Tokyo Section Chair / Council (whichever is approriate here) supporting the Milestone proposal: By the same reason stated above, the Letter of Tokyo Section Chair was lost from the application data. We attach herewith the same as well as References and Supporting Materials (included in the application data) for your further action.
    

    Yours sincerely

    Toshihisa Funabashi Meidensha Corporation

      Funabashi-toshi00:57, 18 April 2013
       

      Hello Toshihisa Funabashi, Meidensha Corporation, Tokyo

      I have reviewed the update you kindly provided and am happy that all the requirements have now been met and documented. I will now recommend this milestome submission be elevated for approval by the History Committee at its next meeting (or teleconference hookup). I sincerely thank you for your help and steps to move this forward.

      Kind regards,

      David Burger IEEE History Committee, Vice-Chair 2013. Mount Colah Sydney, Australia.

        203.9.151.25422:13, 27 May 2013