IEEE
You are not logged in, please sign in to edit > Log in / create account  

Thread history

From GHN

Jump to: navigation, search
Time User ascActivity Comment
20:14, 4 March 2013Ggcooke (Talk | contribs)New thread created 
21:23, 7 March 2013I.engelson (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to Bell Lab)
11:14, 8 March 2014Djkemp (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to Bell Lab)

I have problem with the claim 'negative feedback principle'. A principal is a very general thing. I'm not a HS Black scholar but I believe that Black was referring to electronic controls. Its unfair to those who may wish to nominate negative feedback in process controls, PID, Foxboro Company, combustion controls, generator voltage regulations, load control, and so on.

My second comment is a general one. Has the proposer looked at all of the previously awarded milestones to see if this proposal is in any way in conflict with previously stated claims?

Ggcooke20:14, 4 March 2013
 
I also concur with Mischa Schwartz's observation. In this case having a multiple  plaque presentation is logical. But I also agree that removing redundant text should be considered. Finally, a check if a similar milestone, (like in the case of the transistor,) exists to remove conflicts, may be in order as suggested by Ggcooke.
I.engelson21:23, 7 March 2013
 

Group milestone sounds appropriate. I support this milestone.

Djkemp11:14, 8 March 2014