Editing Milestones-Nomination talk:DISCOVERY OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY 1911
Warning: You are not logged in, pleaseYour IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history. first if you have a valid GHN account.
|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Citation||3||21:11, 22 October 2012|
|Â«no subjectÂ»||1||19:08, 18 August 2011|
|Nomination development||1||18:15, 18 August 2011|
While I appreciate the nominators' desire to preserve the exact words of the notebook, I'm afraid most people will be confused by the construction of the sentence and the use of quotation marks and parentheses. Until I read the notes - which won't be available to people reading the plaque - I was totally mystified.
Another concern in the same sentence is saying that the resistance "was" something "as" the temperature was lowered. The "was" implies an action completed while the "as" suggests a process in progress. I realize this is probably a nit but I think it would be better to say the resistance approached zero or became practically zero as the temperature was reduced or that the the resistance was practically zero after the temperature had been reduced.
I agree that the initial version of the citation for the Milestone plaque had a number of deficiencies. I have conferred with a number of colleagues and also a non-technical person, who teaches English at the high school level,who have proposed a number of changes and correction to the citation which I hope will made it more suitable for use on the Milestone plaque.
The nomination is quite comprehensive and adequately meets the requirements of plague location, benefits and social impacts. The use of the temperature unit "kelvin" seemed obvious to me, and and old physics handbook, but after looking more closely at the discussion thread, the term "kelvins" did only appear once in my google searchs, and that is what the current citation shows. A second set of eyes would be useful to ensure the correct use of "kelvin".
It has been brought to the attention of the nominator that the correct SI unit for temperature is written as "kelvins" and therefor the citation has been edited to correct the incorrect term used originally in the original version of the citation.
I'm not sure to what extent it is known that I have been apponted Advocate for this proposal and that the proposal is approved. I assume the nominators are proceeding with development of the nomination. I think the proposal to hold the dedication on the 100th anniversary is excellent but it will require expeditious action at all steps in the nomination process. Please let me know if I can be of assisance.
Lyle D. Feisel